Case
study
The Acquisition of Celtel An African Company's Choice: IPO or Sale?
Prof. Ian Giddy, New
York University
The Alternatives
In
early March 2005, Celtel International B.V., a pan-African mobile
communications group, was facing a choice for the company's future.
Many felt that now was the time for the private company to do an
initial public offering (IPO), with a listing on the London and
Johannesburg exchanges. Such a listing could give existing shareholders
liquidity, enable the company to raise additional capital for expansion
in Africa, and provide a high valuation for the company's equity. One estimate put the listed value at GBP1.1 billion ($2 billion). Stock markets were rewarding telecommunications players
in emerging markets, so a listing would have placed a relatively high value
on the shares. Celtel's Anglo-Sudanese founder and chairman, Mo Ibrahim, was keen on getting the highest possible price for his 21% stake.
On
the other hand, an IPO would be expensive, and would not immediately
allow major investors to sell their shares. Hence another possibility
being considered was a sale to a major telecoms company. The proposed
IPO was drawing the attention of several international telecoms groups.
"We never had a 'for sale' sign up," said Chief Executive Marten Pieters. "But if interested
parties come in with unsolicited offers at a nice level, the board has
a duty to share those with the shareholders."
What should be done? A decision had to be made soon. Now seemed a good
time to sell the company: the company had just announced that net
profit more than doubled to
$147 million for the year ended Dec. 31 2004, compared with $73 million
in 2003; this news would undoubtedly boost the potential IPO price.
* * *
Pieters
said the group was seeing good returns from its investment across the
sub-Saharan region. "The Group is delivering strong organic growth in
all our
operations and we are now building on our unique position in East
Africa as the only operator in each of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. We
invested more than $250 million in infrastructure in Africa in 2004, an
increase of 140% compared to the previous year. Our focus is to
continue to invest in our pan-African business and
premier brand at a time of rapid growth for mobile telephony on the
continent," he said.
Celtel reported that revenues were up by 62% to U.S. $614 million on a
consolidated basis, due to to strong organic growth of the customer
base and the major acquisition in Kenya. Excluding the Kenyan
operation, the Group grew its revenues by 42% and customers by 60%.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a4e8/5a4e8bcee20bf5a6e70a7fa4248bd140e11e9467" alt="Mo Ibrahim" |
Mo Ibrahim, Chairman
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d07e8/d07e80ea374d4026d56db46fa22fedf0995fee7c" alt="M Pieters" |
Marten Pieters, CEO
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c01c1/c01c17eba190c1df1e2b7c85467c70bef3be3e6f" alt="Tito Alai" |
Tito Alai, Chief marketing Officer
|
EBITDA increased by 59% to U.S. $200 million (2003: U.S. $126
million) as a result of strong growth in revenues and cost controls
despite the Group's investment in the Celtel brand. The Group had net finance costs of U.S. $48 million (2003: U.S.
$26 million). The increase was mainly due to the costs of refinancing.
"As of December 2004, mobile penetration was less than 5% in 10 of
the 13 countries in which Celtel operates (see map). Therefore, the Group
believes that there is significant opportunity for customer and revenue
growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Sub Sahara Africa is currently the world's fastest growing region
for mobile telecommunications," said the company. "The Group aims to position Celtel as a pan-African brand known for
quality of service, network coverage and customer care. Through a
strong brand with a pan-African reach, Celtel aims to increase customer
loyalty, expand its customer base and offer differentiated services."
"The demand for quality mobile telecommunications services in
Africa is reflected in the strong organic growth of the Group's
customer base. During the last quarter of 2004 Celtel was signing up on
average 50,000 new customers per week, with significant numbers in
particular coming from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Kenya."
Africa had a population of 850 million with most growth coming from South
Africa, Morocco, Nigeria and Egypt. There was plenty of potential,
analysts said. Mobile subscriptions across Africa rose 47 percent to
76.5 million in 2004, according to London-based research firm Informa
Telecoms & Media.
The Offer On March 29, 2005 Celtel received a $3.4bn all-cash offer from Kuwait's Mobile Telecommunications Company
(MTC).
MTC, which had a market capitalisation of around $7 bn, had more than 20 years of experience in the cellular business. It.had
operations in Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Bahrain and also had a
strategic partnership with Vodafone Group PLC. It reportedly had 3.4m
customers in the Middle East and aimed to have 15m users
by 2011. Arguing that Celtel shareholders should be happy with the offer, MTC chairman Saad al Barrak said "Together, MTC and Celtel will leverage the strong synergies, shared
cultural values and heritage which exist between the Arab World and
Sub-Saharan Africa."
If accepted, offer would give even the most recent investors a return
of at least 250%
as the most that investors paid was $20 a share and MTC was offering
$56. Shareholders included Actis, a South African private equity
investor, Old Mutual,
and African Merchant Bank. Actis backed Celtel as a start-up and
contributed $77m in three rounds
of funding. Its 9.3% made it the largest holder after Celtel chairman
Mo
Ibrahim. Other shareholders included the Africa Infrastructure Fund and a number of US venture capital firms.
The
cash from MTC would take out existing stakeholders but would not add
any working capital or pay off loans Celtel raised to fund expansion.
To implement its growth strategy, MTC would have to invest a
substantial amount in mobile phone infrastructure in places like
Nigeria.
Celtel had a reputation for being well run: it was profitable and had a presence in 13 countries, but
money was always tight and Celtel's plans for African dominance had been relatively
easy to dismiss. Its management skills and sound business practices
had seen it repeatedly raise debt and equity funding to expand, but a buy-in
from MTC would ease that pressure. If MTC
succeeded in its buyout, some felt this could provide Celtel with the
capital for further African expansion.
The Meeting Some
of Celtel's shareholders -- notably the venture capital firm Actis --
were keen to accept MTC's offer. However the Board wanted to be sure
this was the best possible price that could be obtained for all
shareholders. A hasty meeting was arranged in Amsterdam with the company's advisors, ABN AMRO Bank.
Hendrik Meulenbroek, an experienced M&A specialist at the bank,
opened the meeting. "I've assembled some rough figures based on
research I've been doing on Celtel and MTC," he said. "Let's look at
the numbers. I think that once we've analyzed them, we should be able
to make a decision about whether it makes sense to accept MTC's offer."
Questions
1.
From the point of view of Celtel's shareholders, what are the
advantages of a sale of the company to a strategic buyer versus an IPO?
2.
What is your estimate of a fair acquisition price for Celtel,
considering the benefits to MTC and the possibility of rival offers
from other telecoms companies?
Appendix 1: Meulenbroek's Memo
[confidential - to be provided]
Appendix 2: Celtel Financials
Year end results for the year ended 31 December 2004
Group Key Performance Indicators
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" | FY04 | FY03 | FY04 vs FY03 |
---|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" |
|
|
|
---|
Total managed mobile customers (millions) | 5.2 | 2.5 | 108% |
---|
Proportionate mobile customers (millions) | 3.6 | 1.7 | 118% |
---|
Average revenue per user per month (US$) | 21 | 25 | -16% |
---|
Average churn per month (%)* | 3 | 3 | N.A. |
---|
* Churn equals monthly deactivations divided by the local number of customers at the end of the previous month
Consolidated P&L
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" | FY04 | FY03 | FY04 vs FY03 |
---|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" | Consolidated P&L
US $ million |
|
|
|
---|
Revenue | 614 | 380 | 62% |
---|
Operational expenditures | 414 | 254 | 63% |
---|
EBITDA | 200 | 126 | 59% |
---|
EBITDA % | 32.6 | 33.3 | - |
---|
Profit before tax and minority interests | 186 | 95 | 96% |
---|
Net profit | 147 | 73 | 101% |
---|
The effective tax rate was 17% (2003: 14%) reflecting local tax holidays and non-taxable income.
Consolidated statement of Cash Flows
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" | FY04 | FY03 |
---|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78a1/b78a1e91c25861075b53cbe1fa3d70d9062010b8" alt="" | US $ million |
|
|
---|
Operating activities | 152 | 98 |
---|
Investing activities | (353) | (74) |
---|
Free cash flow before financing activities | (199) | 24 |
---|
Financing activities | 133 | 89 |
---|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (69) | 113 |
---|
Cash and cash equivalents as of 31 December | 64 | 132 |
---|
|