We spend most of our time interacting with,
working for, and living in organizations. This course aims to enhance your
understanding and management of human behavior in organizations (
individual
behavior, including perception and decision making,
interpersonal behavior, including leadership, teamwork, and communication, and
organizational issues such as job design, organizational design, culture, and
strategy.
This course integrates conceptual knowledge
about managing people in organizations with opportunities to develop practical
managerial skills. Videos illustrate course concepts, as do case analyses where
you apply course ideas to problematic situations in real-world organizations.
Teamwork in the course lets you practice and evaluate your effectiveness at
managing, problem solving, and working in teams. The team presentations inject
a bit of competition.
The course complicates your views of
organizations by interrelating ideas, while pointing out the shadings and the
many factors that affect human behavior in organizations. By the end of the
course, you will better understand organizational behavior, and will have
gained some ideas about resolving the problematic situations that organizations
and managers face.
The experiences of past students suggest
that this course has a good chance of becoming the most valuable course you
will take as an MBA student. MBA students who are managing no one and do not
expect to manage anyone for a few years often doubt the value of studying
organizational behavior. However, when
Case Analysis
Case analysis helps you sharpen your
analytic, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. It also lets you apply
When analyzing a case, remember that there
are many possible solutions. The goal is not to find the optimal or sole
solution. There may not be one. Of course, some solutions turn out to be
effective and others ineffective or harmful, but people usually have to
implement solutions in order to find out what results they produce. A good idea
may turn into a bad idea if it is implemented poorly, and shrewd implementation
can salvage a bad idea.
A course should not (and cannot) simulate
real life. Rather, it should provide you with learning experiences. So just
explore the cases and practice analyzing and solving real problems from an OB
perspective.
Teams
Teams play central roles in this course
because teams play central roles in organizations. In organizations, most
people spend most of their time working in, interacting with, and managing
teams. The use of teams has been increasing rapidly in recent years. One goal
of this course is to give you opportunities to practice and evaluate your
effectiveness at managing, problem-solving, and working in teams. Together with
a few other students, you will try to build an effective team. These
experiences will help you to understand teams and to work more effectively
within them.
Sebastian and I recognize that part-time
students find it difficult to get together to work on joint projects, but it
just is not realistic to omit teamwork from an MBA program. Therefore, we are
trying to make team meetings and communications as convenient as possible. Sebastian
will help you assemble teams that link people who will be able to meet at the
same times and who offer each other diverse expertise. Each team will have a
group e-mail address: By sending a message to this address, you will be able to
send it to everyone on your team.
Over half of your grade will come from team
activities, and you will spend a good deal of time working on team activities.
So you need to devote some effort to forming an effective team. This partly
involves putting together people who have different skills or knowledge. It
also requires some serious team-building efforts during the course.
An Important General Observation
At various times, people state generalizations
about differences between ethnic groups, differences between types of
organizations, differences between the outcomes of strategies, differences
between people’s responses to various stimuli. These generalizations often
(indeed, almost always) have weak foundations and the differences are almost
always only small fractions of the variations in behavior. Consider, for
example, the generalization that males are taller than females. As a statement
about heights averaged across all humans, this generalization is certainly
true. But there are many males who are shorter than the average female and
there are many females who are taller than the average male. There are even
subcultures in which the average male is shorter than the average female. So knowing
the generalization tells one nothing useful about the comparative heights of
two specific people.
The graph below shows two statistical
distributions that have different means. The average value of the lavender
variable is greater than the average value of the turquoise variable. However,
such a comparison may create a misimpression that the lavender variable is
almost always greater than the turquoise one. With some statistical
distributions, it could even happen that the lavender variable exceeds the
turquoise one much less than half of the time.
