THE
NUMBERS GAME
By
TRACY BYRNES
Off-Balance Sheet Items Hold
The Key for Curious Investors
Here's a question for you: If an asset is "off-balance
sheet," is it:
a. Nowhere
b. In danger of falling over
c. In the CFOs personal account
Try none of the above. That's because this whole notion of off-balance
sheet reporting can be as understandable as a two-year old's babbling. If a
company has an asset or liability and it's not on the balance sheet, then where
is it? That's what we're going to find out. It's going to be a bit grinding,
but this is the kind of stuff that helps smart investors steer clear of the
Enrons of the world.
Some of the confusion surrounding off-balance sheet items, which
include things like lease agreements, is the name itself. "Off-balance
sheet" is a bit misleading because it implies that something should be on
the balance sheet instead, says Tim Lucas, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board's research director.
The off-balance sheet items are usually found in the footnotes to
the financials, which come after the cash flow statement. The problem is you
have to read them. And, frankly, the folks who write these footnotes were not
English majors. So while, in most cases, no one is pulling the wool over your
eyes, the writing may be jerky and confusing.
Take Tyco, a company that doesn't appear in the news these days without the
words "accounting questions" nearby. Look at Note 7 in Tyco's current
10-K filing, where it discusses its sale of trade receivables. No surprise in
that, but who did Tyco sell that stuff to? The note says it sold the balance to
a "limited purpose subsidiary of the Company." Huh? According to the
footnote, it's tough to tell who the buyer is, though it appears the buyer is
affiliated with the company. And that's one reason accounting-addled investors
have Tyco on their mind. (Why can't they all be like you, Mr. Buffett?)
There are certainly legitimate reasons to report an item
off-balance sheet, according to FASB. And while the rationale for these
off-balance sheet items is up for debate these days, it's up to FASB to change
the standards. And FASB long has been accused of taking its own sweet time
coming out with new standards. So as in most situations, you need to help
yourself.
The four main items reported in the footnotes are lease
agreements, pension assets and liabilities, investments in joint ventures and
affiliates and special purpose entities, otherwise known as the securitization
of assets. We'll tackle the first three today and save special purpose entities
(or SPEs) for next week.
Lease
Agreements
Let's look at the most obvious and oldest item being sent off-balance
sheet: lease agreements.
If you lease an item and the contract doesn't have a special
buy-out option at the end of the lease, then FASB says you can't really call
that an asset you own. Let's say you've leased a BMW Z3 for three years and
you've got a baby on the way. Your wife says it's got to go when the lease is
up since it's a two-seater. While it's a joy ride today, you can't consider it
a personal asset.
The accountants would dub that an operating lease since at the end
of the lease you will return the item and (sadly) move on.
Lots of companies have operating leases. Take Staples, the office
supplies store. It leases a bunch of different buildings for its stores but at
the end of these leases, there's no guarantee for renewals or option to buy the
building, says Albert Meyer, an analyst with David W. Tice & Assoc., an
investment research and management firm in Dallas. Since Staples risks losing
the store, it's not really an asset to them. This is all spelled out in their
footnotes.
Keep in mind, there is nothing wrong with having operating leases
but they are future liabilities that will need to be funded by future revenue.
So it helps to compare. The total cash Staples would have
to pay to cover its leases, which are generally over an extended period of
time, is around $4.4 billion, says Meyer. That's around 41.8% of it's annual
revenue. Is that bad? To find out, compare the figures to a peer company. Office
Depot's operating leases are only 19.5% of its annual revenue,
according to Mr. Meyer, who says he would never analyze a company without
taking into account its operating leases. Mr. Meyer's firm does not have a
position in either Staples or Office Depot.
Pension
Assets and Liabilities
Other big items not shown on the balance sheet are the pension
assets and liabilities. Since the pension assets are put into a trust, a
separate legal entity, the argument is that those assets belong to the
employees, says FASB's Lucas. So it's not fair that the company tries to claim
them.
(But they can manipulate them to pump up earnings, can't they? IBM recently
raised the rate of return on its pension assets from 9.5% to 10%. In this
market? But, in very simple terms, that will increase its pension assets,
thereby decreasing its pension liability and, voila, earnings go up. We'll look
into that accounting maneuver on a future date.)
One thing to look for: "net pension liability," found on
the company's balance sheet. Why only the net? Here's the current logic. Let's
assume there are $300 million in pension assets. But if everyone retired, the
company would need to pay out $500 million. So the company is short $200
million at this time. That's a liability to the company and it better show up
on its balance sheet (and management better come up with the money before we
all retire.)
After the go-go market of the late 90's many companies actually
had a surplus in their pension funds thanks to those rocketing returns. But
things no doubt will change. Sprint PCS, for instance, had a surplus in its
pension plan over the last few years. But in 2000, the plan's assets actually
lost $157 million, according to Mr. Meyer of Tice & Assoc. If that keeps up
Sprint will have to add money to the fund and that will take away from the cash
it needs for its day-to-day business. Mr. Meyer's firm doesn't have a position
in Sprint PCS.
Joint
Ventures and Affiliates
If a company owns a piece of an affiliate or joint venture, in
many instances, it doesn't have to separately report its proportional piece of
the assets and liabilities on its balance sheet. Again, only the footnotes need
the details.
If a company owns 50% or less of an affiliate or a joint venture,
then only the net of the assets and liabilities the company owns pertaining to
that affiliate should hit the balance sheet. In most instances, you'll find
that number under the investments section.
This net number is the result of the "equity method," in
accounting-speak. So if our company owns 50% of a company with $10 million in
assets and $8 million in debt, net assets are $2 million, assuming no goodwill.
Since the company owns half, it reports $1 million as an asset in the
investment section of its balance sheet.
But isn't the company responsible for $4 million in debt? Why
doesn't that ever hit its books? Technically, the company doesn't have to pay
that debt back, says Ed Ketz, associate accounting professor at Penn State
University. The affiliate is given the benefit of the doubt that it will come
up with the money to repay anything outstanding.
No surprise this stuff can appear fishy. And this kind of
accounting may be one reason the stock of highly-acquisitive Cendant stock was
hit earlier this year. Investors were concerned that it was not fully
disclosing all the details of its off-balance sheet investments. Cendant, no
stranger to accounting flub-ups, posted an explanation of its investment in
affiliates on its Web site to attempt to appease the troops. The stock has
since recovered.
Holy
Leveraged
It's very easy to argue that showing a net number on the balance
sheet and leaving all the meat in the footnotes will not give you a clear
picture of a company's total leverage. But let's face it, your portfolio will
be long gone if you wait for FASB to heroically jump to your aid. So take
ownership and do your own digging.
And just doing a debt-to-equity ratio (which is long-term
liabilities divided by stockholders' equity) won't cut it these days. Tally
total debt but then comb through those footnotes and find the total pension
liability, leases outstanding, and affiliate liabilities to name a few. Then
run your debt-to-equity ratio. And be sure to compare that number to its
industry peers.
Whew. Nothing like a little straightforward accounting. And we've
only just begun. Tune in next week as we dissect special purpose entities.
Write to Tracy Byrnes at tracy_byrnes@yahoo.com
Updated February 15, 2002 9:26 a.m. EST